ALGORITHMICS / REFERENCES / GROWTH-PATTERN TAXONOMY

Research method

Growth-Pattern Taxonomy

A working taxonomy for multi-ink plots: classify a system by mechanism and inputs before assigning it a biological metaphor.

Use

These categories are not all slime-mould models. They gather different procedures that can produce growth-like paths, networks, fronts, or fields. For a separable multi-ink plot, one layer should have a distinct structural role—not simply be a recoloured duplicate.

Mechanisms, inputs, character, and ink roles

Multi-ink implications

Give each ink a non-overlapping job: structure versus event, persistent network versus exploratory trace, low-frequency organisation versus high-frequency correction, or source data versus derived path. Separate layers must remain meaningful alone, register to the same coordinate system, and avoid using colour to conceal indistinguishable geometry. Test each layer as a one-pen plot before combining it.

Scope note

Interpretation, not equivalence. A branching line can resemble an organism without being a biological model. Record the actual rule set, input data, seed, and update process; use terms such as “Physarum-inspired,” “reaction–diffusion,” or “field-driven” only when they describe the mechanism.

← References